Criticism of Alt.arts.poetry.comments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. нмŵוτнτ 02:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Alt.arts.poetry.comments

Latina: Alt.arts.poetry.comments

– (View log)

Delete No sources to indicate any notability, nor any found after a quick search. Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 04:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, doesn't seem to be a notable newsgroup. The group that it's a splinter of is also a redlink. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: if the parent newsgroup is non-notable, I have few doubts about the child. --Revanche (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Very few from the alt.* hierarchy are notable, and a newsgroup about offhanded Comments certainly isnt. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.