Talk:Deracination ideology by W. Lindsay Wheeler

From Wikinfo

(Redirected from Talk:Deracination ideology)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Notes

"The 'post-modern experience' is typified by globalisation, deracination, migration, hybridity and distrust of 'grand theory' or the 'exhaustion of modernity'. Koestler's nomadic life-style, transition from one culture to another and his reinvention of himself through his autobiographical writings make his life a classic example of the post-modern odyssey. His intimate encounters with grand theories, notably in the form of Marxism and Fascism, left him with an abiding distrust of the great nineteenth-century narratives of progress, even if he could never fully emancipate himself from them."

Arthur Koestler The Homeless Mind By DAVID CESARANI Free Press

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/c/cesarini-koestler.html Retrieved 2008-3-30


Heidegger could write a 1937 essay, "Ways toward Linguistic Interchange," in which he invites the "poets and thinkers" of neighboring France to assume their own historical mission in the struggle (Kampf) for the "salvation of the Occident" from the "metaphysical essence of technology." The struggle is therefore against the wholesale deracination of ethnic pluralism among the Western nations, through the levelling brought about not only by technological globalization but also by the cosmopolitan universalism promoted since Kant and the Enlightenment and impelled so powerfully by the French Revolution, an abstract universalism which threatens to level us all into rootless "citizens of the world," cosmo-politans.

"Measuring the Millennial Moment of Globalization against Heidegger's Summer Semester 1935, and Other Politically Incorrect Remarks"

Theodore Kisiel Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL tg0tjk1@corn.cso.niu.edu

© 2001, Theodore Kisiel http://www.unt.edu/csph/Vol_01_winter00/kisiel.htm Retrieved 2008-3-30


LACK OF LOYALTY

It used to be, 50 or 60 years ago, that people didn't spy against their country because of a sense of loyalty. They felt themselves a part of the United States, and they would no more betray their country than they would betray a family member. During and shortly after the Second World War, for example, most of the American citizens caught spying against this country were Jews who were selling information to the Soviet Union. Part of the reason was because there was much more sympathy for Communism among Jews than among non-Jews, but part of the reason also was that Jews, as a group apart, felt no sense of loyalty to America. Their loyalty was to other Jews and to Jewish interests, but not to the country in which they happened to be living at the moment. Nowadays, Gentile Americans are nearly as lacking in loyalty to America, nearly as lacking in patriotism, as Jews are. People still feel a sense of loyalty to their friends and their families, but not much else.

The Nature of Patriotism What Factors Control Whether People Are Loyal to Their Country? By Dr. William Pierce Free Speech - April 1997 - Volume III, Number 4 http://www.natall.com/free-speech/fs974a.html Retrieved 2008-3-30 - The above unsigned notes were written by User:WHEELER

>>>I was wondering recently about all the hostility directed toward me, and I finally figured it must be this Note from William Pierce. All I did was type in "deracination" in google and went searching for articles. This one I found was pretty interesting and good and had no idea that this was so politically incorrect. William Pierce sounded familiar but I didn't place the name right away. Now I do. Now, I read this article and found nothing in it morally wrong. It is quite a good piece. I don't care if the Devil spoke it. If the Devil said, 2+2=4, and somebody else said 2+2=5, and a Christian stands there with a dumb look on his face---well, I am going to quote the Devil. Jacques Maritain writes in Intro. to Philosophy,

"For as soon as a truth becomes known to us, by whatever channel, it is sin not to accept it." (pg 88)

If in this piece William Pierce speaks truth about loyalty, then I will use it. If somewhere somebody finds a similar piece written by a Christian, then I won't use this piece but the thing written by a Christian since this Note from William Pierce "offends" somebody. I know that the Roman Catholic Church used to operate a Index of forbidden books, and everbody excoriates the Roman Catholic Church for that---but these same people do the same very thing for the likes of William Pierce? I am ignorant and clueless to "Index of BANNED people whom no one should quote from"---Sometimes I am clueless myself and not in touch with the "political correctness". Maybe somebody ought to link to it!!! WHEELER 17:35, 7 April 2008 (EDT)


"The road would be open for a free inter-mingling of the peoples in a free socialist Commonwealth, with all that would mean in terms of human cultural development. Such a vision of the future is infinitely more inspiring than the narrow and essentially misanthropic utopias of nationalism." http://www.marxist.com/marxism-national-question250200-32.htm Retrieved 2008-4-6.

Here it is the "Final Solution" according to Marxism.

Future notes needed by me WHEELER 23:03, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

construct

"Deracination ideology" is a construct invented by User:WHEELER to indulge in his pseudoscientific anti-marxism. In fact, he is a theologian who pretends to be scientific to add importance to his claims which are driven by religious convictions. The word 'deracination' has in other languages no connotation with 'race' at all - the German term is "Entwurzelung" (= uprooting) - see also the meaning of the English word. It is simply not true (or rather Wheeler's construct) that deracination as a sociological term is in any way related to the denial of race. In fact, sociology uses the term "Entwurzelung" (deracination) together with the adjectives "sozial" (social) or "kulturell" (cultural) showing clearly that "Entwurzelung" (deracination) is not related to biology (race), but to society and culture. It is caused by forced migration, general changes in society, globalisation, individualisation, "Vermassung" and so on.- Mr Mancala 02:33, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

BTW, I googled "deracination ideology", "biologische Entwurzelung" and "rassische Entwurzelung". "Deracination ideology" was found twice both used by WHEELER on Christian forums (e.g. here; showing that it is his invention), "biologische Entwurzelung" was found once (in a fascist / völkische context) and "rassische Entwurzelung" was found nowhere. - Mr Mancala 02:50, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
Original research is ALLOWED on Wikinfo. I know Marxism. The evidence is on the article page--it is all referenced. I coined "Deracination ideology" to describe the cultural/sociological goals of Marxism--to deracinate people. I point to Rosa Luxemburg's essay, "The Nationalities Question". I point to Trotsky's strong "Internationalism". I point to Disraeli concern of the "race" issue. I have much more evidence.
It is apparent to me that many people want to obscure this fact of International Socialism/Communism/Marxism. Many people are not aware that Marxism has a deracination agenda. Many people don't want this information out. To deracinate is the Marxist agenda. People coin new words all the time. Yes, you are correct that deracination means "general changes" but I have added a dimension not considered. I used the term "Deracination ideology" to describe Marxist methodology, called now Cultural Marxism. Political correctness and "Cultural Marxism" are one and the same thing. I am an ANTI-communist. This is information for other anti-communists.WHEELER 21:16, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
What word would you use for this Marxist agenda?WHEELER 21:19, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
How do you explain Black Power and La Raza if deracination defines the Marxist agenda? Fred Talk 18:06, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
That is part of the Marxist dialectic. Many people have noticed that here in America. It is alright for minorites to be ethnocentric--but it is forbidden for Europeans, for the Majority in America, to be ethnocentric. There is a double standard.
Minorities are being used to deconstruct the Majority. Just like Martin Luther King was used to deconstuct the Jim Crow laws of the Old South. They are pawns in a large chess game. It is about undermining and sapping the strength of the majority. In order to make things "equal", the high must be torn down.
Second, this was answered by Rosa Luxemburg or Lenin, I have to find it but the gist is that unnationalized minorities have to be "nationalized" (i.e. given self-determination) in order to bring them up to the next step of nationalization in order to bring them up into the last step, Globalization. I just read it last night, I have to look for it.WHEELER 19:08, 7 April 2008 (EDT)

There is something to what you say, but it remains original research and belongs in a signed article. Fred Talk 19:21, 7 April 2008 (EDT)

I was just wondering, does all original research belong in a signed article? If so, I'm in deep rat doodoo.--AaronCarson 00:53, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

No, but sweeping and controversial generalizations of the sort WHEELER advances do. Fred Talk 06:34, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Solastalgia

For future reference. http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=4355

""Solastalgia is a relatively new concept created by Australian philosopher Glenn Albrecht and first published the journal PAN in 2005 (1). It is defined as “the pain or distress caused by the loss of, or inability to derive, solace connected to the negatively percieved state of one's home environment”. In other words solastalgia is a type of 'homesickness' that occurs while one is still at home. Rapid and radical changes to the home environment turn it into something unrecognizable and can induce a sort of distress similar to that experienced by refugees from war. Albrecht writes that the “dominant components of solastalgia” include “the loss of ecosystem health and corresponding sense of place, threats to personal health and wellbeing and a sense of injustice and/or powerlessness”. (2)""

More proof

Ohh--this is original research? How about more proof of Marxism and the goal of Marxism?

Sweden: The Triumph of Cultural Marxism From the desk of Fjordman on Thu, 2008-10-09 17:11
"Mona Sahlin, leader of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, confirmed that her party and the Greens want to form a coalition government in 2010. What kind of policy will such a government follow? Miljöpartiet de Gröna, the Swedish Green Party, state on their official website that the education system should start working for "gender equality" at an early age; children need counterweights to the gender roles which girls and boys are raised into. Therefore teachers and personnel in child care services must finish an education in equality before they are given their exams. They also want to abolish grades in schools: "We want to do away with the grade system [in today's schools]. Grades contribute considerably to stress and are not a fair and objective system of measuring the individual's potential." The Green Party favor ideological Globalism in its purest form. They want a "world citizenship" to replace the national citizenship, totally free migration on a global basis, global taxes and a strengthened United Nations to ensure a just world order: "We do not believe in artificial borders. We have a vision of unrestricted immigration and emigration, where people have the right to live and work wherever they please… We want Sweden to become an international role model by producing a plan to implement unrestricted immigration." They have a strong focus on anti-discrimination and racism, and desire harsh and swift penalties for "discrimination" yet soft penalties for many other crimes. They want "religiously neutral" holidays (no Christmas or Easter) and education against racism and discrimination to be taught in schools. No "bigotry" against any group of people (except whites presumably, and white men in particular) will be allowed, and all forms of bigotry should be banned by law regardless of where it is voiced. Among the forms of racism they specify should be aggressively stamped out is "Islamophobia." However, they understand that racism cannot be totally stamped out until we have dismantled the "racist world order" and replaced it with a just world order where none suffer and the poor are no longer exploited.

Can it be any clearer, the Marxist agenda...and that Western Culture has been replaced by Cultural Marxism? What is the goal of Marxism? To destroy nations.WHEELER 00:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools