User talk:Anime addict

From Wikinfo

Sysop

You have been promoted to sysop. We cannot extend move privileges generally due to the massive damage move vandals can do. Fred Talk 22:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Well... thanks :) I appreciate it. --Anime addict 22:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Message

See Talk:Reversed_order_of_filters for the reason why it was deleted. --VictorPorton 11:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thank you for cleaning up everything. I should be able to handle it from here. Much appreciation. --Dark Lord 16:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Article

Hey man, Athel's still asking me about that article about him you said you'd make. Can you spare some time for it? I've updated the article about me, hope I did a good job. --Iusty

FFFFFFFFFF- I'll see how I can squeez it in. Sorry for the trouble and delay. --Anime addict 16:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Magic

Okay, I'll bite, why is a philosophical examination of magic a "CPOV? Jok2000 15:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Because you wrote it under the awspice that that's "why magic doesn't exist". That's an obvious critical point of view, because it denies the very existence of the phenomenon in question. --Anime addict 19:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Not completely true. Magic is not a form of naturalism, so certainly naturalism would not be a mechanism for magic. Similarly for Deism & Simulation. The existence of these 3 possible philosophies does convince *me* that magic does not exist, but their mere presence in the article does prove it explicitly. Its analogous to saying "magic is not behind door #1, #2 or #3 for such & such reasons". It just so happens that my house only has 3 closets, but the reader does not necessarily know this. Jok2000 23:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but that's just Wikinfo policy. Please don't confuse that your points have been permanently removed, they are moved at Criticism of magic. That's what we do with any divergent view from the main subject, but users still have access to it if they're interested. Please read the Wikinfo:Sympathetic point of view for more information. --Anime addict 23:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Harsh

I blocked him too, for two hours. Trying to get his attention. Fred Bauder 17:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Oversight

You also have oversight. It is OK to oversight simple nastyness like Grawp here. (Wikipedia's rules are much stricter). Fred Bauder 19:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, just happy I could delete those stuff. And I can imagine what they'd "oversight" there. --Anime addict 19:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:Discrimination_sidebar

This seems alright now Fred Bauder 18:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Didn't work when I voided it, I'm a little surprised myself. --Anime addict 19:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Athelfirth

Please do what you can, including unblocking him or shortening his block and orienting him. And do keep the article on Falcone deleted. Fred Bauder 16:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Sir, yes sir! :)) But seriously, thanks! --Anime addict 16:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

How do you become administrator?

How do you become administrator and what can they do? (TheBest 14:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC))

You should talk to Fred, he's the owner of this site. The most important thing is to be active, the rest comes naturally. --Anime addict 19:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

How are you doing?

Hey AA what is up so far? Any new articles up you created? (TheBest 14:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC))

List of anime

List of anime imported, but you can see why it was deleted. Fred Bauder 20:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

OH....MY....LOL! Well, thanks anyway, I'll try to make something of it when I have time. --Anime addict 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

The Skeptic's Dictionary

Just to point out that the list of contents appears twice in one section. Peter jackson 17:20, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Bureaucrat

I have granted you bureaucrat and checkuser rights. Fred Bauder 05:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again! --Anime addict 16:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Anime addict

From Wikinfo

Contents

Archive