Western philosophy

From Wikinfo
Jump to: navigation, search


Template:PhilosophyTabs

File:Raphael athens2.jpg
Raphael, School of Athens, (Greek philosophers)
larger view

Western philosophy is a line of related philosophical thinking, beginning in Ancient Greece, and including some of the predominant philosophical thinking of some individuals in Europe and its former colonies up to the present day. However, the idea of a "Western" kind of philosophy is a relatively recent idea, and prior to this philosophers such as Plato would have seen their work as universal, and not confined to geographical and political borders. The concept of philosophy itself specifically originated from the ancient Greek word philosophia (φιλοσοφια); literally, "the love of wisdom" (philein = "to love" + sophia = wisdom, in the sense of knowing how to act and what truly exists). However, many non-Western religions have adopted the term philosophy in reference to cosmic intellectual discourse analogous to Western philosophy. Many today think of philosophy in the plural, as if there was a personal philosophy for each philosopher. In the past, one would have thought there was one philosophy, just as there is commonly one study of chemistry, or one study of physics. See Eastern philosophy.

Western philosophy, as a very general and vague idea, has had a tremendous influence on, and has been greatly influenced by, Western religion, science, and politics. Indeed, the central concepts of these fields can be thought of as elements or branches of Western philosophy. To the Ancient Greeks, these fields were often one and the same. Thus, in the West, philosophy is an expansive and ambiguous concept. Today, however, what generally distinguishes philosophy from other Western disciplines is the notion that philosophy is a "deeper" and more rational, fundamental, and universal form of thought than other disciplines.

Contents

Origins

The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker Pythagoras (see Diogenes Laertius: "De vita et moribus philosophorum", I, 12; Cicero: "Tusculanae disputationes", V, 8-9). The ascription is based on a passage in a lost work of Herakleides Pontikos, a disciple of Aristotle. It is considered to be part of the widespread legends of Pythagoras of this time.

"Philosopher" replaced the word "sophist" (from sophoi), which was used to describe "wise men," teachers of rhetoric, who were important in Athenian democracy. Some of the most famous sophists were what we would now call philosophers, but Plato's dialogues often used the two terms to contrast those who are devoted to wisdom (philosophers) from those who arrogantly claim to have it (sophists). Socrates (at least, as portrayed by Plato) frequently characterized the sophists as incompetents or charlatans, who hid their ignorance behind word play and flattery, and so convinced others of what was baseless or untrue. Moreover, the sophists were paid for their explorations. To this day, "sophist" is often used as a derogatory term for one who merely persuades rather than reasons.

The scope of philosophy in the ancient understanding, and the writings of (at least some of) the ancient philosophers, was all intellectual endeavors. This included the problems of philosophy as they are understood today; but it also included many other disciplines, such as pure mathematics and natural sciences such as physics, astronomy, and biology. (Aristotle, for example, wrote on all of these topics; and as late as the 17th century, these fields were still referred to as branches of "natural philosophy"). Over time, academic specialization and the rapid technical advance of the special sciences led to the development of distinct disciplines for these sciences, and their separation from philosophy: mathematics became a specialized science in the ancient world, and "natural philosophy" developed into the disciplines of the natural sciences over the course of the scientific revolution. Today, philosophical questions are usually explicitly distinguished from the questions of the special sciences, and characterized by the fact that (unlike those of the sciences) they are the sort of questions which are foundational and abstract in nature, and which are not amenable to being answered by experimental means.

Western Philosophy's Branches and Subdisciplines

As with any field of academic study, philosophy has many subdisciplines, but few fields are as vast as philosophy. Generally, the subdisciplines can be organized under the major branches below, much as Aristotle divided philosophy originally. There is now a philosphical subdiscipline for nearly all other major fields of study, and most are concerned with the interpretations of those fields.

Philosophy and other Disciplines

Science: Many of the natural sciences historically developed as branches of philosophy, reflecting ancient attitudes that philosophy covered the whole of intellectual endeavours. Aristotle practiced what would now be called biology, meterology, physics, and cosmology, alongside his metaphysics and ethics. As recent as the eighteenth century physics and chemistry were still classified as natural philosophy, the philosophical study of nature. Psychology, economics, sociology, and linguistics all owe their existence to philosophy, and more recently, cognitive science and artificial intelligence have been forged out of the philosophy of mind.

Philosophy is done a priori, and in prose form does not rely on experiment. Philosphy justifies the methods of science without depending on them, and also depends upon non-scientific methods, such as interpretation. Analytic philosophy adherents often urged philosophers to emulate the methods of natural science, and Quine claimed philosophy was a branch of natural science, the most abstract branch, and aproach now called "philosophical naturalism". Philosophers have always devoted study to the sciences and logic. Philosophy is concerned with explaining the foundations and character knowledge in general, in science or history, thus philosophy of science was branched as an active discipline from logic and metaphysics, pursued by trained philosophers and scientists. Some areas of the philosophy of science aim to fully understand experimental work in terms of the larger metaphysical questions, rather than show scientists how to conduct those experiments.

Mathematics: Mathematics uses a very specific set of rigorous methods of proof based on the rules of logic. Most philosophy is written in ordinary, if obtuse, prose, and while it strives to be precise it does not usually attain anything like logical and mathematical clarity. As a result, mathematicians rarely disagree about their results, while philosophers do indeed disagree about theirs, as well as the methods used to attain those results.

The philosophy of mathematics" is another branch of the philosophy of science, but in many ways, mathematics has a special relationship with philosophy. This is directly due to the position of logic, of reasoning, which has traditionally been considered a major branch of philosophy. Mathematics is a most rigorous, rule-governed type of logic, and has always been cited as the paradigmatic example of what logic can do. In the late ninteenth and twentieth centuries, logic made great advances, and mathematics was proven reducible to logic, in terms of first-order logic and set theory. The use of formal, mathematical logic in philosophy now closely resembles the use of math in science, and attracts a very different philosopher than in ethics or aesthetics.

Theology and Religious Studies: Like much of philosophy, religious studies are not experimental. Parts of theology, including questions about the existence and nature of god or gods, clearly overlap with philosophy of religion. Aristotle considered theology a branch of metaphysics, the central field of philosophy, and most philosophers prior to the twentieth century have devoted significant effort to theological questions. Yet, other part of religious studies, such as the comparison of different world religions, can be easily distinguished from philosophy in just the way that the social sciences can be distinguished from philosophy. These are closer to history and sociology, and involve specific observations of particular phenomena. In theology, particular religious practices are the focus.

Religion now plays a more marginal role in philosophy, and both empiricists and rationalists in modern philosophy often held that religious questions were beyond the scope of human knowledge. Many have claimed religious language is itself literally meaningless, questions which cannot be answered. Some philosophers have argued these difficulties are evidence that religious beliefs are are closely related to moral and ethical questions, while others have argued the two were very separate.

Philosophy of Science Connections

causation -- evidence and theory -- nature of experimentation -- faith and rationality -- free will and determinism -- induction and probability -- nature of scientific and natural laws -- the problem of other minds -- the problem of criterion -- scientific explanation -- the reality of theoretical entities -- the reality of unobservables -- technology and science -- validity of the social sciences


See also

External links


References

Retrieved from "http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Western_philosophy"
Personal tools