Misclassification of employees as independent contractors

IRS reclassification as an employee occurs where persons claimed as (or claiming to be) independent contractors are recategorized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), or by state tax authorities, as W-2 employees. The reclassification can result in the imposition of fines, penalties, and back-taxes for which the employer is generally liable. These amounts could cost a business large sums of money. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (formerly known as the General Accounting Office) reports that the IRS claims to lose millions of dollars in uncollected payroll, social security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance taxes because of misclassification of independent contractors by taxpayers. According to IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson in a statement made November 3, 2005, IRS audits of small businesses organized as corporations increased from 7,294 in 2004 to 17,867 in 2005. 

Who is being classified?
Employers must report the incomes of employees and independent contractors using the IRS form W-2 and 1099, respectively. Employers pay different taxes (i.e. Social Security and Medicare taxes, unemployment taxes, etc.) on the wages of a worker that is classified as an employee. However, these same taxes are generally not paid by the employer on the compensation of a worker classified as an independent contractor. If an employer intentionally or mistakenly classifies an employee as an independent contractor, the employer is then at risk for being heavily fined and paying back-taxes.

Being classified as an independent contractor also affects whether an employee can receive unemployment benefits. In many states, independent contractors are not eligible for unemployment benefits because nothing has been paid into the unemployment insurance fund on their behalf. Employers who have no W-2 employees are not required to make payments to the unemployment insurance fund, and since no one can file a claim for benefits, they don't have to worry about their accounts being charged any extra. So should a misclassified employee lose his job through no fault of his own, that employee has no recourse with the Department of Labor and no unemployment benefits upon which to fall back.

Construction workers are often the most misclassified workers in the industry of the United States, Europe, and the Middle East. Workers are misclassified for the employers to reap a different benefit, such as paying fewer taxes and paying less benefit, and workers are paid incorrectly. Organizations fighting against this fraud are shown below.

Employee vs. independent contractor
According to the IRS, an employee is anyone who performs services for an employer if the employer can control what will be done and how it will be done. This was codified in revenue ruling 87-41, and is generally called "the twenty factor test". Independent contractors are defined so if the payer or employer has the right to control or direct only the result of the work done, and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result. There are also other categories such as non-employees, which include direct sellers.

IRS Documents: Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding
If it is still unclear whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor the IRS Form SS-8 can be filed with the IRS.

Organizations Working Against Misclassification

 * Construction Citizen

External links and resources

 * "Independent Contractors vs. Employees", irs.gov
 * "IRS Offers Tips on How to Correct Reporting of Misclassified Employees", irs.gov, March 27, 2006
 * "Avoiding IRS reclassification of workers as employees.", Tracy A. Freeman, The Tax Adviser, February 1 1996
 * "FedEx Drivers Fight for ‘Employee’ Status, Rights", Megan Tady, The NewStandard, July 18, 2006
 * "Sebelius Announces Campaign to Ensure Fairness for Kansas Workers and Businesses", infozine.com, July 11, 2006
 * "Waxman: Blackwater may have evaded millions in taxes", Justine Redman, CNN, October 23, 2007